Health professionals’ experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study

Background: Obstetric ultrasound is considered important for determining gestational age, identifying single or multiple pregnancies, locating the placenta and fetal anomalies and monitoring fetal growth and pregnancy-related complications in order to improve patient management. Objectives: To explore health professionals’ perspectives on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania regarding self-reported skills in performing ultrasound examinations and what could improve access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in the clinical setting. Design: Cross-sectional study. Material and Methods: Data was collected between November and December 2017 using a questionnaire based on previous qualitative research results from the CROss Country UltraSound Study (CROCUS Study). Seventeen healthcare facilities in 5 urban and semiurban municipalities in the Dar-es-Salaam region were included, with 636 health professionals participating (physicians, n = 307 and midwives/nurses, n = 329). Results: Most health professionals (82% physicians, 81% midwives/nurses) believed that obstetric ultrasound was decisive in the clinical management of pregnancy. Results indicate proficiency gaps across disciplines: 51% of physicians and 48.8% of midwives/nurses reported no or low-level skills in assessing cervical length. Similarly, deficiencies were observed in evaluating the four-chamber view of the fetal heart (physicians: 51%, midwives/nurses: 61%), aorta, pulmonary artery (physicians: 60.5%, midwives/nurses: 65%) and Doppler assessments (umbilical artery: physicians 60.6%, midwives/nurses 56.1%). Compared to midwives/nurses, physicians were significantly more likely to agree or strongly agree that utilization would improve with more ultrasound machines (odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.26–3.61), better quality of ultrasound machines (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.10–4.69), more training for health professionals currently performing ultrasound (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08–4.17) and more physicians trained in ultrasound (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.30–4.87). Conclusions: Improving the provision of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Tanzania requires more and better-quality ultrasound machines, enhanced training for health professionals and an increased number of physicians trained in ultrasound use. To further increase the accessibility and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in maternity care in Tanzania, it is essential to provide training for midwives in basic obstetric ultrasound techniques.

ultrasound use.To further increase the accessibility and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in maternity care in Tanzania, it is essential to provide training for midwives in basic obstetric ultrasound techniques.

Introduction
Antenatal care (ANC) plays an important role in reducing the risk of pregnancy-related complications as well as decreasing maternal and child mortality. 1Since 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that all pregnant women should have a minimum of eight contacts with a health provider during pregnancy, as well as one obstetric ultrasound examination before 24 weeks of gestation, to improve maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. 2bstetric ultrasound is routinely offered to expectant mothers in high-income countries (HIC).It is primarily used to determine gestational age, single/multiple pregnancy, placental localization and fetal anomaly and later in pregnancy, it is used as a method for surveillance of fetal growth and other pregnancy-related complications. 3,4Evidence suggests that obstetric ultrasound may improve patient management 5 and in low-income countries (LIC) it appears to play an important role in increasing ANC attendance and in motivating pregnant women to deliver at a healthcare facility. 6In the last decade, obstetric ultrasound has become more commonly used in LIC 3 despite barriers such as ultrasound equipment being costly, and the lack of training and insufficient skills of sonographers and physicians. 7,8][11] An increase in the utilization of maternal care services has been shown to correspond to a steady decline in maternal mortality in Sub-Saharan African countries. 12However, due to the lack of infrastructure, qualified medical personnel and poor access to care, maternal mortality remains high in most LIC. 135][16][17][18] Nevertheless, more than 85% of women attended at least four ANC visits during their pregnancy in 2022, an increase of almost 20% compared to 2015-2016. 19Despite progress towards the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) with a steady decline in maternal mortality rate (MMR) between the years 2000 and 2020, the MMR still stands at 238 per 100,000 live births in the Tanzania. 20ccurate data regarding the number of ultrasound machines and trained staff in Tanzania are currently unavailable.However, our prior investigations have underscored significant concerns among Tanzanian healthcare personnel regarding the scarcity of ultrasound machines, the lack of trained personnel to operate them effectively in the clinics and their proficiency in interpreting obstetric ultrasound examinations. 21,22urthermore, our previous research has underscored the pivotal role of obstetric ultrasound in managing complex pregnancies and childbirth in Tanzania. 21,22

Aim
Studies on health professionals' experiences and views on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound are limited in the scientific literature.Thus, the rationale for this study stems from the need to explore health professionals' perspectives on the pivotal role of obstetric ultrasound in the clinical management of pregnancy alongside accessibility to ultrasound machines.Therefore, we aimed to investigate how health professionals in Tanzania perceive their skills in conducting obstetric ultrasound examinations, identify factors that could enhance the utilization of obstetric ultrasound in clinical settings, and seek to comprehensively understand health professionals' experiences and viewpoints on obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania's context.By examining these aspects, we aim to gain insights to inform strategies to optimize obstetric ultrasound utilization and improve maternal and fetal health outcomes in Tanzania.[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]

Study design
The methodology has been comprehensively outlined in a previous publication from the CROCUS Study. 342][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In this cross-sectional study, a structured questionnaire was employed to explore various aspects of obstetric ultrasound among obstetricians/gynaecologists/ physicians and midwives/nurses involved in antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care for women in the Dar-es-Salaam region of Tanzania.Purposive selection of health facilities ensured a representative sample of health professionals responsible for the clinical management of pregnant women in the region.The STROBE Guidelines have been used when preparing the manuscript. 35e Tanzanian setting Tanzania is located in the eastern part of sub-Saharan Africa within the African Great Lakes Region.Over 100 languages are spoken in Tanzania.However, 90% speak Swahili as a second language, and many educated Tanzanians speak English.Tanzania is a large country of almost 1 million square kilometres, and according to the 2022 census, the Tanzanian population was 62 million. 19ife expectancy was 66 years for men 36 and 68 years for women 37 in 2021.The Tanzanian health system is decentralized, with health services divided into three levels: national, regional and district levels.The pyramidal referral structure of types of services are as follows (arranged from the bottom and up): Dispensaries and Health Centres, District Hospitals, Regional Referral Hospitals and National and Specialized Hospitals (Figure 1).The number of physicians and midwives/nurses in Tanzania was estimated in 2018 to be 0.1 and 0.6 per 1,000 population, respectively, which is among the lowest rates in the world. 38,39Today, there are four government health insurance schemes along with multiple private options.The number of gynaecologists/obstetricians in Tanzania was estimated to be 250 in 2020, according to the Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians of Tanzania (personal communication from author MA).A majority of childbirths in Tanzania are assisted by a skilled health provider, with skilled birth attendance rising from 64% in 2015-2016 to 85% in 2022. 19

Data collection and validity of data
Four data collectors undertook data collection from November to December 2017, supervised in pairs by authors MN or MA.Authors CB and IM assisted with the data collection during its initial phase.All data collectors were trained by the research team prior to the data collection.The questions and statements in the survey were reviewed to ensure clear understanding.The directors of all study sites in the Dar-es-Salaam region were contacted by authors MN and MA to facilitate appointments for potential study participants to meet with the researchers and data collectors and receive information about the study.Healthcare facilities in five urban and semiurban municipalities in the Dar-es-Salaam region were used to obtain a representative sample of health professionals.The municipal regions included were Ilala, Kinondoni, Ubungo, Temeke and Kigamboni.In total, 17 healthcare facilities were included (1 National Hospital, 1 Zonal hospital (private), 3 Regional Referral Hospitals, 3 District Hospitals (2 private), 1 Poly Clinic (private), 7 Health Centres (1 private), and 1 Dispensary.Participants were recruited at their workplace.Each questionnaire was labelled with a unique identification number and a health facility code.No personal identifying data were collected ensuring the anonymity of the participants.The completed questionnaires were scanned into PDF files to be transferred to Sweden where data were manually entered by an administrator into IBM SPSS Statistics software package.The quality of data entry was evaluated by one author (CB) re-entering every 10th questionnaire and the error rate was calculated to be 1.9%.All original questionnaires are stored in a secure, locked location at Muhimbili National Hospital and all the scanned questionnaires are stored on a USB memory stick in a locked location at Umeå University.

Study participants
Eligible participants were obstetricians/gynaecologists/ physicians and midwives/nurses who worked with obstetric ultrasound examinations or applied results of obstetric ultrasound in clinical practice, in healthcare centres and hospitals in the Dar-es-Salaam region.General physicians were invited to participate in the study since they were responsible for the majority of obstetric ultrasound examinations.Nurses were also invited to participate since they care for a significant portion of women during pregnancy and birth, as the number of midwives in Tanzania is limited.No eligible participants declined participation in the study.In total, 638 health professionals agreed to fill out the questionnaire and return it to the data collector.Two questionnaires were lost in the PDF transfer process, thus the primary sample consisted of 636 participants.

Independent variables
All questionnaires were dated, and the mean age of participants was calculated as a continuous variable by subtracting the year of birth from 1 January 2017.Gender was dichotomized as female or male.Current healthcare profession included the response options: obstetrician/gynaecologist, general practitioner, resident physician, physician other (please specify), midwife, nurse, radiologist/sonographer and other (please specify).The variable current healthcare profession was dichotomized into (1) physicians including obstetrician/gynaecologist, general practitioner, resident physician, radiologist/sonographer and physician other, and (2) midwife/nurse.In addition, one assistant medical officer (AMO) and one clinical officer (CO) participated in the survey and were categorized as physicians.The healthcare facility level was categorized as Dispensaries or Health Centres, District hospitals, Regional Referral Hospital, Zonal Hospitals and National Hospitals (Figure 1) where one Dispensary and one Health Centre were considered faith-based.Type of healthcare services was classified as public, private and both public and private.

Dependent variables
Dependent variables investigating health professionals' views regarding the role, access, skills and utilization of obstetric ultrasound are presented in Table 1.Variables concerning health professionals' views on access to obstetric ultrasound and training are presented on a 5-point Likert-point scale with the response options; (1) strongly agree, (2) agree, (3) neutral, (4) disagree, and (5) strongly disagree.Response options for dependent variables concerning self-reported skills for specified obstetric ultrasound examinations were dichotomized into 'No skills to Low skill level' and 'Intermediate to High skill level'.Health professionals' views regarding dependent variables investigating factors that may improve the utilization of obstetric ultrasound were dichotomized into 'Not at all or Not very much' and 'A fair amount or A great deal'.

Questionnaire
The questionnaire was originally developed in English by the research team and included 105 items, that is, statements and questions (Supplemental material).All statements and questions had response options that were either fixed or on a Likert scale.In addition to sociodemographic traits, the survey covered inquiries about access, usage and the significance of obstetric ultrasound in pregnancy surveillance and care.It also included a self-evaluation of proficiency in conducting obstetric ultrasound scans.The questionnaire was translated into Swahili; however, as most educated Tanzanians speak English, it was decided to use the questionnaire originally developed in English.A few adjustments to the original questionnaire were made to better reflect the clinical setting in Tanzania (current profession and current workplace and clarification about how to respond to the questions).To assess understanding and the relevance and appropriateness of the questions and statements, the questionnaire was pilot-tested with one obstetrician/gynaecologist, two resident physicians, two intern physicians, and five midwives, and all found the questions pertinent and interesting.

Sample size and power
Previous publications regarding the outcomes under study are limited in the scientific literature.Therefore, the calculation of sample size was performed through estimated prevalence based on background characteristics and outcome variables.For the outcome requiring the largest sample size 'Maternal health interest should always be prioritized over fetal health interest in care', a sample of 291 obstetricians/physicians and the same number of midwives/nurses (n = 291), working in hospital and healthcare centres, was estimated to detect a difference in the proportion of 0.10 with the power of 80% and a significance level of 5%.

Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used for sociodemographic data where categorical data are presented with proportions and continuous variables are presented with mean values and standard deviation (SD).Pearson chi-square test for categorical data and the independent Student's t-test were used for continuous data when testing for differences between groups.Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).Statistical significance was set at p < .05for all analyses.IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software package was used.
The vast majority of midwives/nurses were female (85%) and 56.9% of physicians were male.The mean age across gender was 37.3 years (SD 9.1).Most participants were married/cohabiting (70.5%) and more than 75% reported having children.Almost all reported having a religious faith (97.6%).Among participants, mean years in the profession and mean years in healthcare were 10.4 (SD 8.7) and 11.7 (SD 9.3), respectively (Table 2).Most health professionals worked in the public sector and in healthcare centres (72.0%) providing antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care while 13.8% were not providing maternity care at the time of the survey (Figure 2).Most participants worked in District, Regional, National or Faith-based hospitals (Figure 3) and the vast majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that obstetric ultrasound examinations are decisive in pregnancy management (82% physicians, 81% midwives/nurses).

The role of obstetric ultrasound
Most participants (77.5%), with 88% of midwives/ nurses and 66.2% of physicians reported not performing obstetric ultrasound, however, of those who were performing obstetric ultrasound, 57.4% (n = 58) of physicians and 40% (n = 16) of midwives/nurses performed obstetric ultrasound daily, with a mean number of obstetric ultrasound examinations of 10.9 (SD 10.3) per day (Table 2).Over 50% (n = 163) of physicians reported having a major role in decision-making regarding clinical management based on obstetric ultrasound, while 35.4% (n = 115) of midwives/nurses reported having a moderate role in clinical management based on obstetric ultrasound.Over 70% of physicians and 48.3% of midwives/nurses reported making decisions on a daily basis in their clinical work based on the results of an obstetric ultrasound (Table 2).

Access to obstetric ultrasound
The consensus among health professionals is that women in Tanzania have access to dating ultrasound (physicians = 65.7%,midwives/nurses = 75.6%).Physicians were statistically significantly less likely to agree or strongly agree that women in Tanzania have access to fetal anomaly screening compared to midwives/nurses.This agreement was consistent regardless of residential area (physicians = 49.7%,midwives/nurses = 60%) or income (physicians = 44.9%,midwives/nurses = 57.7%)(Table 3).
Nevertheless, approximately 70% of health professionals (physicians = 77.1%,midwives/nurses = 59.5%) disagreed or strongly disagreed that there are enough resources in Tanzania to provide medically indicated obstetric ultrasound examinations to pregnant women (Table 3), with physicians twice as likely to disagree or strongly disagree with the statement compared to midwives/nurses (OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.46-3.51).On the other hand, most health professionals agreed or strongly agreed that there was always access to obstetric ultrasound in their workplace when needed (physicians = 76.8%,midwives/nurses = 76.7%), but the lack of ultrasound training sometimes led to suboptimal pregnancy management (physicians = 70.8%,midwives/ nurses = 70%).Nearly 90% of health professionals agreed or strongly agreed that maternity care would improve if midwives were qualified to perform basic obstetric ultrasound examinations.

Self-rated skills for specified obstetric ultrasound examinations
In Figure 4(a), the data indicate that a majority of physicians performing obstetric ultrasound examinations rated their proficiency as intermediate or high in routine obstetric ultrasound assessments, including assessing fetal presentation (68.3%), placental localization (61.2%), fetal heart rate (71.2%), amniotic fluid (57.3%) and estimating gestational age using biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL) and abdominal circumference (AC) measurements (56.7%).A majority of physicians performing obstetric ultrasound examinations reported no skills to low-level skills regarding the assessment of cervical length (51%), fetal heart:  four-chamber view (51%), aorta and pulmonary artery (60.6%) and Doppler: umbilical artery (60.6%) (Table 4).Comparatively, midwives/nurses performing obstetric ultrasound examinations rated their obstetric ultrasound skills lower than physicians across various ultrasound assessments (Figure 4(a) and (b)).

Improving utilization of obstetric ultrasound
Approximately 9 of 10 health professionals reported that utilization of obstetric ultrasound would improve 'A fair amount or A great deal' if there were more ultrasound machines (physicians = 92.2%,midwives/nurses = 84.8% )   and better-quality machines (physicians = 96.3%,midwives/ nurses = 92.0%), more training for health professionals currently performing obstetric ultrasound (physicians = 95.6%,midwives/nurses = 91.2% ), and if there were more physicians (physicians = 95.6%,midwives/nurses = 89.6%)and midwives (physicians = 91.5%,midwives/nurses = 90.6%)trained in obstetric ultrasound (Table 5).The distribution of answers is shown in more detail in Figure 5(a) and (b).The numbers were similar for health professionals working in the public or private sector or both, as well as for those performing or not performing obstetric ultrasound (Table 5).Compared to midwives/nurses, physicians were more likely to agree or strongly agree that utilization would improve with more ultrasound machines (OR 2.13; 95% CI Both public and private 11 ( Numbers in parentheses are percentages unless otherwise specified.CRL: crown-rump-length.*Significance test p < .05.

Discussion
This study aimed to comprehensively explore health professionals' perspectives on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Tanzania.][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Reducing MMR remains one of the top priorities of the MDGs, with concerted efforts contributing to the decline in MMR in Sub-Saharan countries. 12However, many LIC continue to demonstrate unacceptably high MMRs due to infrastructure deficiencies, inadequate access to care, and limited screening for early obstetric risks. 13Despite a demonstrated decline in MMR in Tanzania, the current MMR remains high in comparison to other LIC. 201][42][43] Despite more than 85% of women in Tanzania attending at least four ANC visits during pregnancy, 19 it is still just half of the recommended ANC contacts now advocated by the WHO, 2 indicating a need for enhanced screening for prevention, early detection and treatment during pregnancy. 44][47] Nevertheless, only 20% of the health professionals in our study working in obstetric care reported performing obstetric ultrasound examinations themselves.
The use of portable and more robust ultrasound equipment is becoming increasingly more common 48 and may offer better access to obstetric ultrasound for women in rural areas.49,50 Health professionals in this study expressed significant concerns about the lack of ultrasound equipment and resources to provide medically indicated obstetric ultrasound examinations, which aligns with the findings in the qualitative CROCUS Study in Tanzania. 22nterestingly, these concerns stand in contrast to the majority of health professionals agreeing or strongly agreeing that there was always access to obstetric ultrasound when needed and that women in Tanzania have access to obstetric ultrasound regardless of income and residential area.This discrepancy has been noted in a previous publication based on the CROCUS Study in Rwanda. 33The results revealed that although health professionals generally recognize the importance and necessity of obstetric ultrasound, many report insufficient resources and equipment to adequately meet these needs.However, within their specific workplaces, access was generally perceived as available when needed, suggesting a disparity between local and broader resource availability perceptions.This highlights a complex interplay between perceived local accessibility and broader systemic resource limitations.The self-reported levels of obstetric ultrasound skills in our study provide insight into participants' ultrasound competence, which indirectly reflects their level of education and training in obstetric ultrasound. 33Based on the findings of our study, it is evident that there is a variation of self-reported skills in obstetric ultrasound examinations among health professionals.While most participants perceived themselves to have intermediate to high skills in routine obstetric ultrasound examinations, such as assessing fetal presentation, placental localization, fetal heart rate, amniotic fluid and determining gestational age using BPD, FL and AC, they reported having no skills or lowlevel skills in more advanced obstetric ultrasound examinations, including the assessment of fetal heart: four-chamber view, aorta, pulmonary and umbilical artery, a finding congruent with another study. 51The variation in skill levels raises important considerations regarding the training and education of health professionals in obstetric ultrasound.This is particularly important given that over 60% of the participants reported making daily clinical decisions based on obstetric ultrasound examinations, and a similar percentage indicated having a moderate to major role in decision-making regarding the clinical management of pregnancy based on obstetric ultrasound findings.Previous findings from the qualitative part of the CROCUS Study in Tanzania indicated that there was a need for further training of physicians in how to operate ultrasound machines as well as interpretation of images to increase access and adequate utilization of obstetric ultrasound. 22In this larger study, insufficient or lack of training was considered to lead to suboptimal management in pregnancy by most health professionals.Previous research has demonstrated that healthcare workers can be effectively trained in basic obstetric ultrasound use and that skills are retained over time. 8,47,52In addition, healthcare workers trained in obstetric ultrasound feel more empowered and motivated to screen pregnant women for obstetric risks. 47][55] Despite the important role of obstetric ultrasound in pregnancy and childbirth, understaffed and underfinanced health systems, with the addition of an ineffective referral system and inadequate infrastructure for obstetric emergencies, will continue to struggle with lack of capacity. 56Yet it is important to understand the potential positive impact of increased availability and utilization of obstetric ultrasound together with sufficiently trained health professionals in LIC.Miller et al 44 coined the terms 'too little, too late' (TLTL) and 'too much, too soon' (TMTS) where TLTL indicates inadequate resources or withheld or unavailable care until too late, thus associated with high MMR.In contrast, TMTS implies over-medicalization of normal pregnancy and birth, that is, unnecessary use of nonevidence-based interventions.TLTL is mostly ascribed to LIC and TMTS to HIC; however, these two extremes can coexist in the same country.Participants in this study reported that improved quality of ultrasound equipment, more training opportunities and increased ultrasound machines, along with training more midwives to perform obstetric ultrasound, would improve the clinical management of pregnant women in Tanzania.These improvements may also represent a vital component in a broader strategy to enhance pregnancy-related outcomes and to reduce MMR. 57However, to achieve substantial and lasting improvements, the entire healthcare system must undergo reforms to establish a safe, high-quality, and evidence-based obstetric and neonatal care chain of care LIC. 56

Limitations
Previous studies addressing health professionals' views of obstetric ultrasound are lacking, thus our sample size and power calculation were based on the assumption of proportions for outcome variables in relation to background variables.A total of 636 participants (n = 307 physicians and n = 329 midwives/nurses) were recruited, enabling sufficient power for all pre-planned subgroup analyses to be undertaken.We aimed to recruit a representative sample of health professionals, including both ultrasound operators and non-operators from public and private healthcare, different-level hospitals and healthcare centres.However, by limiting recruitment to the urban and semiurban Dar-es-Salaam region, we cannot be certain that our sample is representative of the whole of Tanzania.Other limitations of the study include the potential for data obsolescence, given that the data was collected in 2017.Since then, practices and challenges in obstetric ultrasound provision in Tanzania may have evolved, impacting the relevance of the findings to current circumstances.
The questionnaire was translated into Swahili, but in the end, only the English version was used (with a few adjustments).Despite pilot testing of the English version and that most educated Tanzanians speak English, it is possible that some questions were not fully understood by all participants.It is noteworthy, however, that none of the invited participants declined to take part in this study, and there were few missing responses.This suggests that the questionnaire was both relevant and well-received by the participants.The high participation rate and the completeness of the responses indicate that the questions were generally clear and comprehensible and that the participants were engaged and found the content of the questionnaire pertinent to their experiences.
The self-reported nature of obstetric ultrasound examination skill levels raises concerns about the validity of these responses.Participants' ability to distinguish between low and intermediate levels of proficiency can be inherently subjective and ambiguous.This ambiguity underscores the necessity for further investigation into the assessment methods used and highlights the need for more objective measures of proficiency to ensure accurate and reliable evaluations of skill levels.Implementing ultrasound simulation and providing sufficient training in obstetric ultrasound have been demonstrated to improve skills and competency, offering a more standardized approach to evaluating and enhancing proficiency among healthcare professionals. 58

Conclusion
Most participating health professionals in Tanzania stated that obstetric ultrasound is decisive in the clinical management of pregnancy and that access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania would improve with more and better-quality ultrasound machines.Yet, most health professionals reported inadequate skill levels regarding more advanced obstetric ultrasound examinations.In addition to more adequate resources to increase access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound to improve the provision of obstetric care in Tanzania, it is evident that more training of health professionals is also required.To further improve maternity care in Tanzania, there was also strong support for more midwives to be trained in basic obstetric ultrasound examinations to increase access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Level of health facility.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a) Factors that may improve the utilization of obstetric ultrasound physicians.(b) Factors that may improve the utilization of obstetric ultrasound midwives/nurses.

Table 1 .
Dependent variables and their response options in the questionnaire.What do you believe would help improve the utilization of ultrasound at your clinic/workplace?• More ultrasound machines • Better quality of ultrasound machines • More training for health professionals currently performing ultrasound • More doctors trained in ultrasound • More midwives trained in ultrasound Pregnant women in my country have access to dating ultrasound (i.e.estimation of gestational age) • Pregnant women in my country have access to fetal anomaly screening • Pregnant women in my country have access to obstetric ultrasound independent of area of living • Pregnant women in my country have access to obstetric ultrasound independent of income • There are enough resources in my country to provide medically indicated obstetric ultrasound examinations to pregnant women who need it • At my workplace, there is always access to obstetric ultrasound when it is needed • At my workplace, lack of ultrasound training for the ultrasound operator sometimes leads to suboptimal pregnancy management • Maternity care in my country would improve if midwives were qualified to perform basic ultrasound CRL: crown-rump-length.

Table 2 .
Descriptive information about the study sample and comparisons between physicians and midwives/nurses.
Numbers in parentheses are percentages unless otherwise specified.SD: standard deviation.*Significance test p < .05.

Table 3 .
Health professionals' views of access to ultrasound and training analysed by univariate logistic regression using physicians as the reference group.a Reference group.*Significance test p < .05.

Table 4 .
Self-rated skills for specific obstetric ultrasound examinations.

Table 5 .
Factors that may improve utilization of obstetric ultrasound analysed by univariate logistic regression.